[etherlab-users] "Invalid mailbox configuration", how to configure?

[Stefan Löfgren]

Yes, your hint was absolutly perfect. And your next statement was possibly
also correct. To get all the understanding I need I have to read hexdumps
and code. And possibly found something (see my last post about the SMs).
Could you please send a hexdump of your slave to help me verify my theory?

/S


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Phil Sutter <sutter at informatik.hs-furtwangen.de>
To: etherlab-users at lists.etherlab.org
Sent: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:52:41 +0100
Subject: Re: [etherlab-users] "Invalid mailbox configuration", how to configure?

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:34:19PM +0100, Stefan Löfgren wrote:
> > Well, the SM-information is there right? (1800,14,261), (1832,14,22,1)
> > (1000,8,24,1) and (1100,8,10,1) and should be evaluated by 
> > ec_fsm_slave_scan_state_eeprom_data in the 
> > "evaluate category data"-section... But not working?
> 
> Your EEPROM looks quite fine, mine is only 128 Bytes of size. My hint
> was to look at the XML to find the right values, as I find them a lot
> more readable than hexdumps. ;)
> 
> My solution would be to just fill in the mailbox and corresponding sync
> information and hope it'll find the rest on it's own (via CoE).
> 
> Why exactly the data is not being read out from the EEPROM at slave
> scanning phase is a question better to be answered by some developer
> having deeper insights in both the protocol and code than me (who's just
> about a few days further than you currently are ;).
> 
> Greetings, Phil
> _______________________________________________
> etherlab-users mailing list
> etherlab-users at lists.etherlab.org
> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
------- End of Original Message -------