[etherlab-users] Working counter of EL9820

[Hobin Yoon]

Florian,
It looks only some combinations are valid in terms of working counter.
Will you analyze the experimental result?

Best regards,
Hobin Yoon

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Hobin Yoon <hobinyoon at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for the late reply. I have attached log files.
> SM0 + SM2: 3/3 (actual / expected)
> SM1 + SM2: 3/3
>
> Best regards,
> Hobin Yoon
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Florian Pose <fp at igh-essen.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:56:39AM +0900, Hobin Yoon wrote:
>> > Plz find the attached log file. It is strange that the expected working
>> > counter is always 1 when I mapped the PDOs that belong to a SM.
>> >
>> > SM0, SM1, SM2: 3/5 (actual / expected)
>> > SM0: 1/1
>> > SM1: 1/1
>> > SM2: 1/1
>>
>> Yes, I forgot, that the LRW datagram is not used, when only inputs or
>> only outputs are part of the domain. Please try SM0+SM2 and SM1+SM2, or
>> include a second slave, so that the LRW datagram type is used.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Florian Pose
>>
>> http://etherlab.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> etherlab-users mailing list
>> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20090328/1ad339fd/attachment-0002.htm>