[etherlab-users] Fieldbus Safety

[Newell Jensen]

Wilhelm and etherlab list,

Re-pinging to see if this has been implemented yet or whether it will be
implemented soon.

Thanks!

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Dr.-Ing. Wilhelm Hagemeister <
hm at igh-essen.com> wrote:

> Hallo Newell,
>
> for the configuration of the safety components we want to use the
> already existing software of the slave vendor (e.g. TwinCAT from
> Beckhoff). The configuration is stored in the slaves so you only have to
> do the configuration process ones.
>
> The task of the ethercat master is to just copy the "safety process
> data" from one slave to another slave.
> This has nothing to do with SIL 3, because we do not rewrite the
> configuration software.
>
> This is not really difficult. But we integrate it as soon as we need it
> for our projects.
>
> I think this will be in the next 3-5 month.
>
> Regards
>
> Wilhelm.
>
>
> Am 08.11.2010 18:09, schrieb Newell Jensen:
> > Wilhelm,
> >
> > I also forgot to ask whether or not this new software would be SIL 3
> > certified as well?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Newell
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Newell Jensen <pillar2012 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Wilhelm,
> >>
> >> Do you have any projected dates or timelines that you guys are trying to
> >> meet?  If its something timely I might even be able to get my work to
> >> allocate me time to help you guys with the implementation.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Newell
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Dr.-Ing. Wilhelm Hagemeister <
> >> hm at igh-essen.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Newell,
> >>>
> >>> we are planing to integrate that feature into EtherLab because we need
> >>> that as well I the near future.
> >>>
> >>> Regards Wilhelm.
> >>>
> >>> Am 05.11.2010 17:31, schrieb Newell Jensen:
> >>>> Hello All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am new to this list and was wondering if anyone knows if it is
> >>>> possible or has used Etherlab with Beckhoff's TwinSAFE PLC (EL6900).
> >>>>  Basically, we would like to use Etherlab but we have to meet safety
> >>>> specifications (and don't want to have to re-spec any software etc.)
> so
> >>>> it would be great if anyone has any information on this.  Any
> questions
> >>>> are welcome.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Newell
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> etherlab-users mailing list
> >>>> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> >>>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Newell
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


-- 

Newell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20110311/06787c56/attachment-0003.htm>