[etherlab-users] skipped/unmatched datagrams - at startup - safe to ignore?

Florian Pose fp at igh-essen.com
Tue Jun 26 10:31:53 CEST 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 23.06.2012 01:26, schrieb Matthieu Bec:
> I'm now able to get reliable clean starts (no more startup
> warnings) by ramping up my cycle time in increments; like 1, 2, 4,
> 8, 10 kHz over a short period.
> 
> Is anyone using similar "warm-up" technique?

No. I think, you should check if your RT app is causing latencies at
startup. Are you using RT-PREEMPT? Did you avoid causing pagefaults by
locking the memory and cause an initial pagefault before cyclic operation?

- -- 
Best regards,
Florian Pose
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/pc3kACgkQABFOIMygR8zwUACgoZeCkw9O26hjm0XlQ5Y+ztpf
j2gAn2+ws0scMQBVLOyKg7es/ogBFLDU
=XijT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Etherlab-users mailing list