[etherlab-users] e1000e
William Ratcliffe
will at manusolve.co.uk
Fri Jun 7 11:45:37 CEST 2013
Hi,
We are using this driver also with no problems with RTAI and 1.5.2 stack
We're using ubuntu 10.04 LTS as per linuxcnc distribution with their
standard rtai kernel 2.6.32-122 rtai
Thanks
On 07/06/2013 00:43, George Broz wrote:
> <etherlab-users-bounces at etherlab.org> wrote on 05/31/2013 08:58:22 AM:
>
> > From: Ian Norton <I.Norton at CranfieldAerospace.com>
> > To: <etherlab-users at etherlab.org>,
> > Date: 05/31/2013 08:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: [etherlab-users] e1000e
> > Sent by: <etherlab-users-bounces at etherlab.org>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It appears the e1000e driver does not work.
> >
> > The work around is to use the generic driver, which seems to be OK.
> > At least for what we're doing.
> >
> > regards
> > Ian
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Norton
> > Sent: 08 May 2013 17:46
> > To: Ian Norton; etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> > Subject: RE: [etherlab-users] e1000e
>
> > OK,
> >
> > This linux note appears to be the reason why the compile fails below.
> >
> > They changed the headers a long time ago!!!
> >
> > http://git.lpclinux.com/?p=linux-2.6-
> > lpc.git;a=commit;h=03e6d819c2cb2cc8ce5642669a0a7c72336ee7a2
> >
> > What's the way around this?
> > regards
> > ian
> >
>
> We're using the e1000e driver with Linux 2.6.37.6 (x86) and the 1.5.2
> release of the IgH stack. It builds and works just fine.
>
>
> Regards,
> --George Broz
> Moog Inc. Industrial Group
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> etherlab-users mailing list
> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20130607/5df90edd/attachment-0005.htm>
More information about the Etherlab-users
mailing list