[etherlab-users] Working counter of EL9820

[Hobin Yoon]

Missed the attachments.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Hobin Yoon <hobinyoon at gmail.com> wrote:

> Plz find the attached log file. It is strange that the expected working
> counter is always 1 when I mapped the PDOs that belong to a SM.
>
> SM0, SM1, SM2: 3/5 (actual / expected)
> SM0: 1/1
> SM1: 1/1
> SM2: 1/1
>
> Best regards,
> Hobin Yoon
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Florian Pose <fp at igh-essen.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:12:18PM +0900, Hobin Yoon wrote:
>> > They all work correctly. I have done input/output on those three SMs.
>> >
>> > root@:~# ethercat pdos
>> > SM0: PhysAddr 0x0f02, DefaultSize    0, ControlRegister 0x44, Enable 9
>> >   RxPdo 0x1a00 "Byte 0"
>> >     Pdo entry 0x3101:01,  8 bit, "Output"
>> > SM1: PhysAddr 0x0f03, DefaultSize    0, ControlRegister 0x44, Enable 1
>> >   RxPdo 0x1a01 "Byte 1"
>> >     Pdo entry 0x3101:02,  8 bit, "Output"
>> > SM2: PhysAddr 0x1000, DefaultSize    0, ControlRegister 0x00, Enable 1
>> >   TxPdo 0x1600 "Byte 0"
>> >     Pdo entry 0x3001:01,  8 bit, "Input"
>> >   TxPdo 0x1601 "Byte 1"
>> >     Pdo entry 0x3001:02,  8 bit, "Input"
>> >
>> > Does it make any difference if I map only PDOs that belong to a SM at a
>> > time?
>>
>> Yes, it would be interesting to know, which sync manager causes the
>> incorrect working counter. I guess the result will be that two sync
>> managers give the correct working counters and one (probably one of the
>> output SMs) will not increase the working counter.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Florian Pose
>>
>> http://etherlab.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> etherlab-users mailing list
>> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20090106/8fa2f73d/attachment-0005.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: el9820-sm0-sm1-sm2.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20090106/8fa2f73d/attachment-0020.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: el9820-sm0.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3339 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20090106/8fa2f73d/attachment-0021.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: el9820-sm1.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3466 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20090106/8fa2f73d/attachment-0022.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: el9820-sm2.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3614 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20090106/8fa2f73d/attachment-0023.obj>