[etherlab-users] Working counter of EL9820

[Hobin Yoon]

Plz find the attached log file. It is strange that the expected working
counter is always 1 when I mapped the PDOs that belong to a SM.

SM0, SM1, SM2: 3/5 (actual / expected)
SM0: 1/1
SM1: 1/1
SM2: 1/1

Best regards,
Hobin Yoon

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Florian Pose <fp at igh-essen.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:12:18PM +0900, Hobin Yoon wrote:
> > They all work correctly. I have done input/output on those three SMs.
> >
> > root@:~# ethercat pdos
> > SM0: PhysAddr 0x0f02, DefaultSize    0, ControlRegister 0x44, Enable 9
> >   RxPdo 0x1a00 "Byte 0"
> >     Pdo entry 0x3101:01,  8 bit, "Output"
> > SM1: PhysAddr 0x0f03, DefaultSize    0, ControlRegister 0x44, Enable 1
> >   RxPdo 0x1a01 "Byte 1"
> >     Pdo entry 0x3101:02,  8 bit, "Output"
> > SM2: PhysAddr 0x1000, DefaultSize    0, ControlRegister 0x00, Enable 1
> >   TxPdo 0x1600 "Byte 0"
> >     Pdo entry 0x3001:01,  8 bit, "Input"
> >   TxPdo 0x1601 "Byte 1"
> >     Pdo entry 0x3001:02,  8 bit, "Input"
> >
> > Does it make any difference if I map only PDOs that belong to a SM at a
> > time?
>
> Yes, it would be interesting to know, which sync manager causes the
> incorrect working counter. I guess the result will be that two sync
> managers give the correct working counters and one (probably one of the
> output SMs) will not increase the working counter.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Florian Pose
>
> http://etherlab.org
> _______________________________________________
> etherlab-users mailing list
> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20090106/558fdb3e/attachment-0004.htm>