[etherlab-users] TestManager Sampling rate + accuracy issue

[Alex C. Marton]

Dear Mr. Hacker,
Dear EtherLab community,

I admit I was wrong and I regret what I did.
Please accept my apologies to you and to the whole EtherLab community for the 
post, my inappropriate use of language and my misspelled words!
I admit I spent a lot of time since yesterday thinking about "How can I right a 
wrong?" that I did to you, but I do not believe I can do you any justice by 
adding anything else than a sincere "I am sorry and I apologise!". Nevertheless, 
 I do take full responsibility for everything I have done as I am aware I have 
misjudged my own actions. You have full freedom to decide what action to take in 
this case.

Alex C. Marton

________________________________
From: Alex C. Marton <martonalex at yahoo.com>
To: Dr.-Ing. Wilhelm Hagemeister <hm at igh-essen.com>
Sent: Tue, December 14, 2010 4:10:01 PM
Subject: Re: [etherlab-users] TestManager Sampling rate + accuracy issue


Dear Mr. Hagemeister,
Dear EtherLAB users,

I apologise for my previous post and my inappropriate language! I realise I made 
a mistake letting my feelings for this kind of work get in the way of the actual 
question/work.
I have no excuses on my part to justify my language, nor do I wish to tell you 
any.

Thank you again for your consideration!
Have a good day!
Alex M.


________________________________
From: Dr.-Ing. Wilhelm Hagemeister <hm at igh-essen.com>
To: Alex C. Marton <martonalex at yahoo.com>; etherlab-users at etherlab.org
Sent: Tue, December 14, 2010 2:55:50 PM
Subject: Re: [etherlab-users] TestManager Sampling rate + accuracy issue

Dear Mr Marton,

if you don't like the TestManager you can bring it back to the shop and
you get back what you payed for it...

If you want to have answers for your questions I would advice you to ask
them in a more polite way...

Regards Wilhelm.

Am 14.12.2010 11:38, schrieb Alex C. Marton:
> Dear all,
> 
> I have a problem with the data acquisition in TestManager. 
> 
> First of all, my specs:
> etherlab 1.2-rc10
> My linux version is: openSUSE 11.2 "Emerald" - Kernel \r
> My RTAI version is 3.7.1
> Matlab is R2009b, Simulink version is: v 7.4 and RTW is: v 7.4
> 
> Now, I have just learnt through experimenting that the "fundamental
> sample time" in the configuration Parameters in my Simulink model i have
> built, is actually the maximal sampling frequency that will appear in
> TestManager , in the Data Transfer option for every channel.  This is
> quite a find for me because nobody explains this stuff anywhere! The
> Testmanager documentation is in German (lol!), all I have is an english
> translated documentation for TestManager 3.4 which is not good at all.
> Ok, now that I finnaly can sample at the sampling rate I want, next step
> is to choose the accuracy for each channel, right? Not quite! Well it
> turns out that whatever accuracy i put in there (3,4...9) and then
> trying to acquire some channels using the Scope, and then exporting the
> acquired data in Matlab-format, Testmanager never respects/maintains the
> accuracy number i put in there. For example if i select 1000Hz sampling
> time + 3 accuracy  (3 digits after the "." in the number) for a channel,
> then after exporting, Testmanager just spits out data @ 1000Hz with 16
> floating point digits after the "." in the number. This of course  has
> serious impact because for 10 seconds of data i get files of 11-20 mb
> for 1 channel -> aka not good!
> May I ask you: "what is going on?" because I have no idea. 
> Thank you for your time!
> 
> 
> Alex M.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> etherlab-users mailing list
> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20101215/273173a9/attachment-0004.htm>