[etherlab-users] Etherlab 2.0 generic slave (ec_slave3) port configuration issue

[Raz]

where is 2.0 ?

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Robert Wilson <rpwilson at stanford.edu>wrote:

> Yes, the latest revision now works without modification. Thanks!
> -Rob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Florian Pose" <fp at igh-essen.com>
> To: etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 2:27:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [etherlab-users] Etherlab 2.0 generic slave (ec_slave3) port
> configuration issue
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Rob,
>
> Am 28.12.2012 02:02, schrieb Robert Wilson:
> > In the latest EtherLab revision (0d8acc30e5aa) it looks like in
> > ecrt_support.c an offset computation gets summed twice for the
> > conversion destination. Specifically, in ecs_start():
> >
> > convert->dst =  pdo_map->domain->io_data + pdo_map->offset; + bytes
> > * pdo_map->idx;
> >
> > where pdo_map->offset is already updated in register_pdos() with:
> >
> > pdo_map->offset += bitlen*pdo_map->idx / 8;
> >
> > If I remove the "bytes*pdo_map->idx" all of the output pdos have
> > the correct byte alignment on the wire and all of the input pdos
> > have the correct byte alignment in Simulink, and everything works
> > as it did with the RTAI Simulink target. Not sure if this breaks
> > other pdo configurations, though.
>
> good point! We fixed that already (2110fa7180ae), but forgot to push
> before xmas ;-). Please check, if this is working for you.
>
> - --
> Viele Grüße,
> Florian
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlDmroAACgkQABFOIMygR8xD1wCcDzgpC4um8PRp+dadwj+DDtCW
> F80AnRR1YweAsuGwvrVUL1XV6PGIrjmt
> =Aa7n
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> etherlab-users mailing list
> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
> _______________________________________________
> etherlab-users mailing list
> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>



-- 
https://sites.google.com/site/ironspeedlinux/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20130105/017b5dbc/attachment-0004.htm>