[etherlab-users] Dynamic configuration : RAM versus EEPROM

[Raz]

hammm.. i missed that.
i can see that ec_fsm_pdo_read_action_next_pdo does this work. when does
ec_fsm_pdo_read_action_next_pdo is being called in the state machine ?

thank you


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Florian Pose <fp at igh-essen.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 02.01.2013 13:47, schrieb raz ben yehuda:
> > Currently, the TxPDOs and RxPDO structures are fetched from drive's
> > SII.
>
> ...and via CoE, if the slave supports that.
>
> > Question: Is there a way to build RxPDOs and TxPDOs according to
> > list of objects in CAN objects 0x1600 and 0x1a00 ?
>
> This is already implemented. The currently assigned PDOs are fetched
> from 0x1c1x and the entries from the respective PDO objects. But keep
> in mind that this only has informational character. For configuration,
> you should always supply the PDO mapping via ecrt_slave_config_pdos().
>
> - --
> Viele Grüße,
> Florian
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlDmrywACgkQABFOIMygR8x1WwCfaqRtUeV4esqIL/q7W6JuT0Fv
> NswAoKIql6qe4tLf97Fg+b4hWcnbZFDD
> =g02Y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> etherlab-users mailing list
> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>



-- 
https://sites.google.com/site/ironspeedlinux/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20130104/c8ed9db1/attachment-0004.htm>