[etherlab-users] EL6692 connector

[Jasper Westpfahl]

I work part time, so I will resume working on this problem early on thursday and post logs.
Please excuse the delay.




Jeroen Van den Keybus <jeroen.vandenkeybus at gmail.com> schrieb:
>Could you post the output of the dmesg log (post only relevant section,
>no
>Linux booting etc... eventually run dmesg -c beforehand) ?
>
>What was the output of 'ethercat domains' ?
>
>J.
>
>
>2013/11/11 Jasper Westpfahl <jasper2 at gmx.net>
>
>> Thanks Jeroen, l looked at the dmesg output with debug level 1. It
>> repeatedly tells me that
>> Mapping of PDO 0x1601 is already configured correctly.
>> ethercat pdo still does not show those entries. I do not know what to
>make
>> of that.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Jasper
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeroen Van den Keybus <jeroen.vandenkeybus at gmail.com> schrieb:
>>
>>> Perhaps you could also use 'ethercat debug 1' ?
>>>
>>> Also, while your application is running, you could check 'ethercat
>>> domains'. You should be able to see what will be sent to the slaves
>by your
>>> application.
>>>
>>> J.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/11 Jasper Westpfahl <jasper2 at gmx.net>
>>>
>>>> Thank you Richard, I did not know about that parameter. The debug
>>>> information, however does not mention the block. It only gives me a
>few
>>>> warnings of unconnected in-/outputs of other blocks, no errors
>whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>> I am using Etherlab 1.3-pre 14-Sep-2010
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Jasper
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Richard Hacker <ha at igh.de> schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Jasper,
>>>>>
>>>>> click on the block to select it, then call
>>>>> set_param(gcb,'debug','1')
>>>>> from the matlab prompt and update your model. Check the debug
>>>>> information of the slave to see whether your configuration worked.
>>>>>
>>>>> What version of etherlab are you using?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Richard
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 11/11/2013 09:42 AM, schrieb Jasper Westpfahl:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Etherlab users,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am trying to configure the EL6692 connector from a Simulink
>model with
>>>>>> a generic block and a device description xml to transmit various
>data
>>>>>> between two masters. Neither Simulink nor dmesg throw any errors,
>but
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the RxPdo that are supposed to be configured do not show up on
>'ethercat
>>>>>> pdo -p 9' . The TxPdo do, with the exception of the last
>'stuffing' byte
>>>>>> (for alignment), show up. I have attached the xml and the output
>of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'ethercat pdo -p 9' in the hope that someone can have a quick
>look and
>>>>>> give me a pointer. I would appreciate it. Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Jasper Westpfahl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # ethercat pdo -p 9
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SM0: PhysAddr 0x1000, DefaultSize 256, ControlRegister 0x26,
>Enable 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SM1: PhysAddr 0x1100, DefaultSize 256, ControlRegister 0x22,
>Enable 1
>>>>>> SM2: PhysAddr 0x1200, DefaultSize 0, ControlRegister 0x24, Enable
>1
>>>>>> RxPDO 0x1600 "RxPDO-Map"
>>>>>> SM3: PhysAddr 0x1800, DefaultSize 20, ControlRegister 0x20,
>Enable 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TxPDO 0x1a03 ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x10f4:02, 2 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x0000:00, 6 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x0000:00, 3 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x1800:09, 1 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x1800:07, 1 bit, ""
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x10f4:0e, 1 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x10f4:0f, 1 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x10f4:0a, 1 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x10f4:0b, 32 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x10f4:0c, 32 bit, ""
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x10f4:0d, 32 bit, ""
>>>>>> TxPDO 0x1a00 "TxPDO-Map"
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:01, 32 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:02, 32 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:03, 64 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:04, 64 bit, ""
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:05, 64 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:06, 64 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:07, 64 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:08, 64 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:09, 1 bit, ""
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x6000:0a, 1 bit, ""
>>>>>> PDO entry 0x0000:00, 6 bit, ""
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> etherlab-users mailing list
>>>>>> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
>>>>>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mit freundlichem Gruß
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Hacker
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> etherlab-users mailing list
>>>> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
>>>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> etherlab-users mailing list
>>> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
>>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> etherlab-users mailing list
>> etherlab-users at etherlab.org
>> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
>>
>>

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/attachments/20131111/f14cd070/attachment-0004.htm>